This study explores a new way to improve cooperation in a coordination game called the minimum-effort game. In this game, coordination problems often happen. The researchers introduced a novel rule where players can talk to each other while making commitments step by step. This approach has a unique prediction: it should lead to the best outcome in the game. They found that this enhanced communication significantly increased participants’ rewards and resulted in better outcomes compared to other non-binding forms of communication. The study also pinpointed the important elements of this rule that contributed to these improvements.
Minimum Effort Game
The minimum-effort game is a concept used in game theory and experimental economics. In this game, participants are typically presented with a situation where they need to coordinate their efforts to achieve a common goal. The twist is that there are multiple strategies or levels of effort they can choose from, and they have to decide collectively which level of effort to exert.
The goal of the game is to find the right balance between individual and group interests. If everyone chooses a low level of effort, the group may fail to achieve the goal, resulting in lower individual payoffs. On the other hand, if everyone chooses a high level of effort, the group can succeed, but individuals may incur higher costs.
The minimum-effort game often serves as a simplified model for real-world situations where cooperation and coordination are essential, such as teamwork in organizations, environmental conservation efforts, or public goods provision. Researchers use this game to study how people make decisions in such scenarios and how different factors influence their choices.